Monday, August 23, 2010

Retro....grade? – Reflections on whether I was right to back Clegg

Inspired by the retro reflections of the inimitable Paul Walter and this excellent article by Gaby Hinsliff – I decided to trawl through some of my numerous blogs supporting Nick Clegg's candidacy three years ago. Longsuffering readers will remember that I was unstinting in my support for Nick, despite much criticism from those who thought it was misplaced. The past few months have caused me to consider this question in a way I didn't feel I needed to back in 2007.

When it became clear that there would be an election for a new leader I remember having a conversation with Nick to say that if Steve Webb stood I would of course back him. In the event Steve chose not to and Nick let me know that he had Steve's support. My reasoning for supporting him was simple – I didn't trust Chris Huhne's "left" credentials, but I did trust Nick's liberal ones. While I didn't agree with him on quite a few issues, having worked with him on our crime policy I knew him to be a true liberal and someone who cared deeply about the life chances of those who were all to often ignored. I trusted him and I liked the way he was prepared to listen even when he vehemently disagreed with you. When I sent him an angry email about us not fielding a candidate against David Davies he took the trouble to call to explain his decision. While he jokingly referred to me as a "little lefty", I felt that we were agreed on outcomes if not process – and for that reason vociferously supported his campaign, to the extent that I was thanked by his campaign manager at his victory party, who rather kindly said he thought my blog could have made the difference in the narrow margin of his victory! So my support for Nick, despite our differences has been unquestionable and unwavering.

So what now? Those heady days of the leaders' debates seem long gone – rather as those hot days of July seem a million miles away as I sit here on a very damp and cool Exmoor. The man who I believed could truly inspire both our party and the country seems a shadow of his former self. He seems to be backing things that are anathema to me, can I possibly continue to support the man? It is a tough one. To be honest I feel rather as one does when a friend ends up in a relationship that you know is wrong for them. It may not be physically abusive, but it is emotionally abusive. The friend seems to stop being able to be themselves – they dress as their partner desires, they speak as he or she desires, they have less and less contact with their old pals. You know that old pal you know and love is in their somewhere, but their unequal relationship with their new partner is stifling their true identity. Now I understand all the chat about us being the "junior partner" but frankly no unequal partnership can work, regardless of the size of the partners! While I accept that our government ministers in general and our Deputy PM in particular have collective responsibility, this surely doesn't mean they are obliged to appear to sacrifice their integrity? I am extremely disappointed that what is coming across is that we are more than happy to go along with the Tories. There is no explanation or restatement of Lib Dem policy – no rationale for the compromises that were made in our name. It is this, I believe, more than anything, that has lead to our drop in the polls.

So, can I still support Nick? Despite my support for him I have always felt able to challenge him (hence the quote on the top of my blog!) and one of the things I admire about him is he is not someone to fall out with folk just because they have a different opinion. So the answer is yes personally, yes politically on some things, but no on some significant others. Yes, personally, I still admire him and believe he can, if he wants to, turn things around. I still rate him as an exceptional, compassionate and committed human being. I still think given the options, (Simon Hughes having also ruled himself out) he was the best person to lead our party. Yes, politically, I do believe he will play a significant role in making this a far more liberal country, and yes, I think he can play an equally significant role in improving social mobility . No, politically, I don't like the way he seems so comfortable in bed with the Tories and adopting their mantra. No, I can't go along with his rationale for supporting such savage and damaging cuts. No, I can't support the way he seems to have accepted being muzzled - how ironic that the man who was such a vociferous critic of the bombardment of Gaza last year was almost silent about the flotilla, leaving it to Mr Cameron to describe Gaza as a prison camp.

So, to return to Gaby Hinsliff's analysis. I agree Nick is a fox, though in some ways he may be more of a hedgehog at the moment! I trust he will rediscover his foxyness, stand up to his new partner and demonstrate what those of us who know and admire him recognise, that he does have what it takes to make this not only a more liberal country, but a fairer and more equal one too.


just-ramble-on said...

You've hit the nail on the head; it's the seemingly unstinting support for the Tories that is so appaling for those who voted LibDem in 2010 and are now saying "Never again" - like me.

It's clear from what Nick Clegg says and writes that he believes the survival of the coalition to be the number 1 priority, above all others, even when this means that the poorest and weakest in society are hit hardest. One can only conclude that the intoxicating liquor of power has gone to his head

Foregone Conclusion said...

Are you seriously comparing your disagreement with Nick Clegg to an abusive relationship? Jesus wept...

Linda Jack said...

No its not MY disagreement with Nick it's HIS relationship with Cameron!

Norfolk Blogger said...

Nick Clegg needs to remember he is in the Lib Dems, not the party of government. These are two seperate things and this does not come over in his speaking.

Tigger said...

You said:

"...I have always felt able to challenge him ... and one of the things I admire about him is he is not someone to fall out with folk just because they have a different opinion."

I was very disappointed last week by Nick's extremely disparaging dismissal of Lib Dem Councillor, Tony Vickers' question after his RICS speech. I have no idea whether it was a stupid question or not, but dressing down "one of your own" live on the BBC is quite simply unprofessional.

If he was really that angry about the question (and I'm not sure he should have been) he should have spoken to Vickers off camera afterwards or phoned him later.

This incident poisoned the speech for me, which is a pity as it was quite a good speech.

He followed this up with an unspeakable degree of aggression in "answering" an ex-Lib Dem voter in Newcastle on Thursday, again shown live on BBC News 24. It was painful to watch. Has he no idea how this looks on live TV? I was appalled.

In addition to which, he almost always repeats the same answers over and over again at each opportunity and has been doing so for months now. Has he no ability to speak off the cuff?

I'm not a Lib Dem member so I can only take your word for it when you say that Nick is an able, decent person.

Last week my sort-of, maybe, giving the coalition the benefit of the doubt was pretty much finally stretched to breaking point by these episodes.

We members of the public are not opposing MPs and shouting at us as if we are is no way to win us over. He seriously needs to reassess the way he relates to us.